Why dont buses own seatbelts?
Answers: Nice choice of catogory by the way!!
I dont know, they'd probably be vandalised, i dont know.
Coaches enjoy seat belts!
same sense as trains dont - safer not to have them overall.
Oh,right i see,i thought this be going to be a joke,goodbye.
Uhh.. why is this surrounded by the fish category?
Don't know. Why is this in 'fish'?!
2 points
The same principle fish dont have them.
Fish
have/nt see many fish on the bus .plenty of ripened crabs though .lol
There are a few thousands of buses in the country,if the political affairs were to bother to put form belts on each spaces on buses tehy would spend a few hundred gran on em and besides your safety relies on the driver anyway
I would believe its because a bus is so big. Think about it, if a bus is surrounded by a wreck with another motor it will just plow through it.
Fish.... Bus form belts.... I cant see the connection but anyway, because they dont hold to by law and it save money not buying a new bus or fitting belts.
Nobody care about kids, its adjectives about money.
I guess cos so copious people stand up it wouldn't be paid that much difference. But it does kind of confirm that public transport users are considered to be 2nd class citizens.
Most busses solely go a tremendously short distance between stops. Therefore it is not feasable to get passenger on and off nippy if seatbelts were within place. There are a variety of other reason, but it comes down to only long distance (intercity) routes would be credible to get belts.
Think of the problem at a crash site where on earth the bus flipps on its side and there is a fire. How do you bring the 35-45 kids out of that bus if their seatbelts are done up and under pressure?
Because fish don't necessitate seat belts lol
1. why is this is fish?
2. smaller quantity expensive
3. less time for relations to get on a rotten
4. people might not resembling using the same seatbelts as others
5. lots of individuals wouldn't bother putting them on anyway
Good question, I devise they should, even if people are solely on buses for a short time, it's matching as taking a short drive in your sports car. Not wearing a seat belt surrounded by a car is an fault so why not a bus. If you go on a coach near are always form belts these days.
I reckon because people attain on and off too without delay, and also because they would probably be in a really disgusting condition!
Probably because they'll only get vandalised close to everything else does on buses!! I think they should own them though - bus drivers drive crazily! The amount of times I've almost fallen sour my seat because the bus drive have swerved in or out of a bus stop too summarily!
its faster when people drop out since family will be having different drop sour points/stations,thus time saving.Again it cuts costs to enjoy it without form belts.Another advantage of not have seat-belts is to make it confident to break out panel in armour of emergency without any hassle or hindrance
I'm not sure. I've never kept a pet bus in my fish tank.
Hi Vicky, This was settled by government contemplate 'tanks' on the grounds that fish a) seldom use public transport [they prefer to 'cycle'] & b) have trouble fastening buckles.
lone local buses dont have them as they dont step that far or that fast plus they cant spawn any to fit fish
this doesent sound fishy to me
The Pets information post by website user , PetQnA.com not guarantee correctness.
More Related Questions and Answers ...
